|
Post by RydCook on Oct 18, 2006 16:32:31 GMT
as for working with the same people on films, its worth noting that shane co-wrote his first three films (24/7, A Room For Romeo Brass and Once Upon A Time In The Midlands) with Paul Fraser. For DMS shane and paddy wrote it, and paul fraser provided additional material. This Is England (shane's new film) was entirely written by shane. Actors: worth mentioning he has worked with Paddy Considine on two feature films and many shorts. I'd say DMS was definately typical meadows, natualistic acting and scenes, comedy mixed with very emotional moments etc. Hope this helps I found the autuer project a lot of fun when i did it.
|
|
jack
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by jack on Oct 29, 2006 22:14:13 GMT
cheers mate! im just doing the powerpoint now it's looking good!!
|
|
|
Post by RydCook on Oct 31, 2006 10:57:46 GMT
no problem hope ya get a good grade!
|
|
|
Post by anonlytwin on Nov 1, 2006 14:25:26 GMT
the auteur theory soon resorts to analysing elements of a film that most other forms of film criticism would ignore or lay at the door of coincidence and chance... you know.. was that license plate in 'psycho' hitchcocks way of communicating a long harboured regret that his mother never kissed him before he went to sleep- lets watch every single hitchcock film and see if any other license plates include the letters Q and M and the numbers 1 and 6... etc. if the auteur theory remains a method in which coherent style, methodology, vision can be explored in the work of one director then I'm all for it and I'm all for saying yes Shane is a auteur... it can go too far though. I'm happy to settle with the fact that Shane has a very individual approach to cinema and the cinema he produces is a realisation of this individual approach... he has no sense of decorum and does not submit to pre-prescribed ideas of what cinema should be. if this is being an auteur then cool.
|
|
joan
Junior Member
Posts: 12
|
Post by joan on Nov 8, 2006 13:11:20 GMT
This all depends on your opinion of the autuer theory and if you consider it to be generally wrong as I do. However, this does not dismiss from the fact that there are some identifiable 'meadows' touchs in his films, but..... could this be drawn from the fact that he often works with similar people. hmmmm I think I have asked more questions than come up with answers there sorry.
|
|
|
Post by RichK on Nov 8, 2006 20:35:32 GMT
Yet again another thread that underlines the brilliance of these forums. Opinions backed up by sound reason - you should all be very proud of yourselves, most forums are awful slanging matches that quickly descend into pointlessness. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by fatself on Nov 16, 2006 23:53:26 GMT
Well, another auteur of the form is Mike Leigh...and I found this relating to both Mike Leigh and Shane on the Living Icons section of the BBC forum (see how I tied that in there): This man is a prominant figure of British film-making, and his contibution should be commended. And if the bfi finance department will allow it, he and Shane Meadows may be able to revive the diminishing standards of the filmic output in this country...even if he does have a face that looks as if its been stuffed with foam.
|
|