|
Post by Morell™ on Mar 25, 2008 18:18:13 GMT
What a way to get attention! How can you top that? 'Is Shane a sex offender?' 'Shane touched me down there: Exclusive photos' quite a strange and despicable tactic to be honest. However to my knowledge being a gay isnt a crime, or comparable to a being a sex offender. And as Shane has responded, surely this despicable act of self promotion has worked. Just to clear up a bit I wasn't comparing homosexuality to Sex offenses I was comparing the thread title with equal levels of sensonalisation. Shane has responded and that's fair enough but if the thread was called 'Shane help pleeeeese!' I'm sure the response would have been equal without all this flabby stuff from us following on. As far as 'thinking outside the box'. I feel that if you think that this kind of lazy low level communication is 'thinking outside the box' your trapped in one. It's Sun newspaper level communication, the lowest common denominator. I wasn't expecting highbrow from anyone Davros but calling someone gay just for attention is playground tactics. I wasn't particularly offended by it, just thought it was poor and shocking. I'm not sensitive folks.
|
|
|
Post by salvador on Mar 25, 2008 18:20:28 GMT
How about "Shane's Films are Shite!" as a title, would that get attention?
|
|
|
Post by jim woolley on Mar 25, 2008 18:30:47 GMT
Aren't you two previous posters reading the undercurrent evident in the original posting though? Everyone needs a forum to 'out' themselves right?
|
|
|
Post by Davros on Mar 25, 2008 18:49:35 GMT
Just to clear up a bit I wasn't comparing homosexuality to Sex offenses I was comparing the thread title with equal levels of sensonalisation. Shane has responded and that's fair enough but if the thread was called 'Shane help pleeeeese!' I'm sure the response would have been equal without all this flabby stuff from us following on. As far as 'thinking outside the box'. I feel that if you think that this kind of lazy low level communication is 'thinking outside the box' your trapped in one. It's Sun newspaper level communication, the lowest common denominator. I wasn't expecting highbrow from anyone Davros but calling someone gay just for attention is playground tactics. I wasn't particularly offended by it, just thought it was poor and shocking. I'm not sensitive folks. low level smilicon Trust me, I have no issue with any way of communicating, and any form of communication. Every form of has its hole or box. Ignoring those you assume are below you can lead to all sorts of trouble. Your 'Lazy low level communication' certainly has its audience, and reason to exist, which is a whole debate in itself. I find though, if you close your eyes tight enough all The Sun readers and McDonalds eaters vanish without trace. As far as thinking outside of the box, I dont remember this much debate for any other 'Shane help pleeeeese!' thread. Or even a reply from Shane. So although probably unintentional, as a forum thread its pretty decent. I think even Chewbaxters still waiting for his reply. And yes. It is that time of the month. Manopause.
|
|
|
Post by Davros on Mar 25, 2008 18:52:44 GMT
It's a shame if there isn't any forum interaction from this member though - I'm intrigued by him I think. However, I was reading the Small Time board and there's a thread there titled 'The Monguls are touching cloth yoth' !!! Other than making me laugh, I am perplexed as to what it means...I'm sure there's a deeper meaning to it. Any insights? I reckon the 'Is Shane Gay?' thread must have a deeper meaning beyond its prosaic nature as well. Possibly a repressed desire so don't be too hard on the guy. We've all got urges right? Excellent. I think your onto something here..... what cloth and which Monguls...
|
|
|
Post by PatrickCoyle on Mar 25, 2008 18:57:25 GMT
I wasn't expecting highbrow from anyone Davros but calling someone gay just for attention is playground tactics. He only asked it, remember. He didn't call it.
|
|
|
Post by johartley on Mar 25, 2008 19:54:31 GMT
Davros,... i dont think people are licking arse etc, they are just saying how wank the thread title is, and being honest, no-one cares if anyone is gay or whatever blah blah,... you have missed the point. Well done neil you got yr wish... im pleased for you. Yr post to me was a little less cringworthy than yr early ones, i see you have obstacles now, but dreams are not put to bed, thats where we have them. We all struggle, my post to you was about yr compilation of words used to shock. You could of thought of something else??. You dont have to be contraversial unecessarily...im sure yr pictures speak louder and clearer than you did! You have set yourself up now..... no pressure!! Good luck to you and yrs... and calm down in future with the eager beaverness. Desperation is an offputting thing. I know!!! jo
|
|
|
Post by shanemeadows on Mar 25, 2008 20:43:51 GMT
I think you may have misread my reply, You don't send them to me Neil. You post them for all to see as everyone else does on the forum. I don't live in a house anymore anyway, I live in a Gay bar in Soho where I dance on a podium for snacks.
|
|
|
Post by fattaxi on Mar 25, 2008 22:21:34 GMT
I'll slip a couple of curly wurlys in your thong mate
|
|
|
Post by salvador on Mar 25, 2008 23:04:07 GMT
I think you may have misread my reply, You don't send them to me Neil. You post them for all to see as everyone else does on the forum. I don't live in a house anymore anyway, I live in a Gay bar in Soho where I dance on a podium for snacks. Does Alan Partridge do a lap dance for you? Lady boys
|
|
|
Post by Chewbaxter on Mar 25, 2008 23:30:03 GMT
I think you may have misread my reply, You don't send them to me Neil. You post them for all to see as everyone else does on the forum. I don't live in a house anymore anyway, I live in a Gay bar in Soho where I dance on a podium for snacks. Here... I is confused... are you talking to the 'Gaygate' scandaliser called Neil.. or me - yes... I'm Neil too - that's why I always end my threads with: N. or: Neil. If it's him - fair do. If it's me... then what am I posing for all to see??? The vicar warned me 'gainst people like you! N. P.S. What snacks by the way?
|
|
|
Post by Davros on Mar 25, 2008 23:30:08 GMT
Although I pretty certain the point wasnt missed. I quite enjoyed it all, where's Jill again?
|
|
|
Post by jim woolley on Mar 25, 2008 23:56:32 GMT
Who's Jill Davros? Have you read the Small Time topic page? Shane himself started a thread about the cloth, the monguls (spelt wrong I think) and I can't get that set of words out of my head. But I need illumination. You know what its all about Davros?
|
|
|
Post by jill on Mar 26, 2008 3:43:06 GMT
Funnily enough I'm in San Francisco! (What a show off eh) There's currently an All Male Nude Review playing here on the splendidly named Nob Hill if Shane fancies a change from Soho. .......And no, I haven't been......apparently it's just for the boys
|
|
|
Post by shanemeadows on Mar 26, 2008 10:02:57 GMT
Not you Chewbaxter. Sorry for the confusion. I meant that the other Neil should post his photo's or links to them on the site so everyone on here can give feedback rather than just myself.
|
|