|
|
Post by anonlytwin on May 31, 2007 19:13:41 GMT
Like that dick irvine welsh, what a twat. Trainspotting was good we dont need to know what happened ten years or whatever later, you onlu wrote it for the film you bald tosser. really? i thought porno was worth a read |
|
|
|
Post by Hyde on May 31, 2007 19:21:00 GMT
defo worthy of a read, at some points i was like "hmmm there's no point to this" but it is fun.
doesnt get any better than trainspotting and marabou stork though.
|
|
|
|
Post by anonlytwin on May 31, 2007 19:25:04 GMT
empire strikes back- we counting that- easily the best ... i'm out haha never realised it had already been taken... i really am out |
|
|
|
Post by Hyde on May 31, 2007 19:25:16 GMT
also, pusher 2, even 3!!!!
same formula different character(s)
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on May 31, 2007 20:59:19 GMT
Toy Story 2 28 Weeks Later Jurassic Park 2 That's the only ones ever.  |
|
|
|
Post by RydCook on May 31, 2007 22:54:46 GMT
Batman Returns? Better than Batman IMO.
Desperado
agreed about 28 Weeks, although its not better. just good.
Maybe think of more later.
|
|
|
|
Post by DeLarge on Jun 1, 2007 0:06:01 GMT
Dawn of the Dead, Aliens and Terminator 2 springs to mind as genuinely great sequels perhaps even better than the 'first'.
Godfather part II already mentioned. And I'd also say The Good, the Bad and the Ugly should count.
Evil Dead 2 (although I'm not a massive fan)
Shit sequels any that are pointless and purely money makers ....plus the likes of Ghostbusters 2 was weak as piss, Police Academys' and The National Lampoons Vacations went downhill after the first.
Caddyshack 2 was fucking dire. as was Blues Brothers 2000 a proper money making horrorshow.
Whilst on a similar subject - pointless dire remakes :
Get Carter. Michael Caine - why spoil it by being in that gash?
The Wicker Man. I won't go near it.
Italian Job.
Good remakes are few and far between I'm at a loss to think of any. Scarface perhaps? Cape Fear? The Departed too maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by anonlytwin on Jun 1, 2007 9:11:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by pointblank on Jun 1, 2007 17:49:33 GMT
de niros max cady was awsome even after catching the orignal,but i saw the hitcher with sean bean(who i normally like)........what a load of old shit
|
|
|
|
Post by DeLarge on Jun 2, 2007 13:38:02 GMT
I cannot understand why they even remade the Hitcher. The original isn't too old and it's hardly a big film, probably only got very minor cult status too. A strange one that.
|
|
|
|
Post by RydCook on Jun 2, 2007 17:53:26 GMT
Scarface was a re-make?
I actuaslly think Ghostbusters 2 is awesome, honestly can't see much wrong with it. I mean an obvious cash-in, but i do genuinely think its a great film.
Other Bad sequels: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2 and 3
|
|
|
|
Post by anonlytwin on Jun 10, 2007 21:05:52 GMT
sure, the original was a howard hawks film from 1932. and a truly groundbreaking film for its time... didn't do much for all the italians trying to make a home in the country though... much like de palma didn't do much for the cubans... good film though
|
|
|
|
Post by darren on Jun 14, 2007 15:54:26 GMT
The thing is which character would we follow from TIE in a sequel.
Harvey as he goes on to be a yuppie in the city. Drinking champagne and waving a big bunch of notes around going LOADSAMONEY
|
|
|
|
Post by pointblank on Jun 14, 2007 16:55:40 GMT
woody and lols story would be a good one loads of scope there........anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by RydCook on Jun 14, 2007 17:11:39 GMT
would be a good idea for a thread, see how many spin-off ideas we can come up with.
|
|
