|
|
Post by PatrickCoyle on Oct 30, 2006 0:07:19 GMT
In fairness, Dave, most "teens" in horror films are over 35.  Though it is worrying that the allpurposefilms site at the moment consists of no substance beyond the campaign thing... |
|
|
|
Post by Hyde on Oct 30, 2006 0:12:51 GMT
Yeah but look at the Shining, it has that kid, I think thats what Daves on about.
edit: Ring remake, The Omen remake etc
|
|
|
|
Post by PatrickCoyle on Oct 30, 2006 0:17:40 GMT
I know mate, I knew what Dave meant, I was just trying to lighten the mood in the thread a bit! (I don't think I use smileys enough)  |
|
|
|
Post by Hyde on Oct 30, 2006 0:21:11 GMT
Oh I see... haha yeah I read it serious! my bad!
|
|
|
|
Post by mike4173 on Oct 30, 2006 0:32:47 GMT
i do agree with patrick coyle that the all purpose films website has little substance at the moment.That is because i only launched it about 6 weeks ago.The main problem is that it does not have any products to sell ie no movies.
All going well i will be in a position to sell a dvd within the next 6 months.the site will then feature interviews with actors,crew etc.
As well as teaser downloads.
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by GADGE! on Oct 30, 2006 1:05:48 GMT
OOPS I SIGHNED THE DAMM THING (BEING 16) AND THEN I READ THE REST OF THIS FORUM(BAD DOBBY BAD) THE IDEA OF SEEINGP PEOPLE OF THE SAME AGE TO ME IN PORN JUST DISGUSTS ME. ALRIGHT KIDS IN 18 NON PORN MOVIES IS OK BECAUSE WELL BECAUSE THERE NOT "DOING IT" BUT JESUS MAN U WANT KIDS TO MAKE PORN EWW!
GADGE!
|
|
|
|
Post by romeobrass on Oct 30, 2006 8:40:04 GMT
Now If you are saying that you want to make Porn Available to 16 year olds, I'm all for it! I mean What, your allowed to do it, but not watch it? Are 16-17 year olds encouraged to shag with their eyes closed? I'm shocked that even if it was in your strange mind kez, to want to watch 16 year olds having sex, that you would be daft enough to tell the world about it  This is defo not something that i would be voting for you filthy git!! I wouldn't be any more shocked if in your next post you put 'If she's old enough to pull em up, she can pull em down' Thats probably your favorite saying on a Saturday night out ;D |
|
|
|
Post by large michael on Oct 30, 2006 9:04:56 GMT
i have to say, this is the first time that a) ive witnessed someone in the process of grooming ,and b) ever wanted to damage based purely on a forum post. Congratulations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Companero on Oct 30, 2006 11:16:54 GMT
Lowering the age of consent for those participating in pornography is an awful Idea. When I think of the decisions I was incapable of making at EIGHTEEN, let alone 16, I would have to say that this is preying on youngsters' vulnerability.
No disrespect Mike, but casting kids in skin flicks isn't helping them out, is it? All it's doing is fuelling the seedier side of pornography and giving the raincoat brigade something a little bit more risque. Where do you draw the line?
Anyone that visits the site that is under 18, please don't think I'm trying to patronise you or people your age. I just happen to think we should look out for younger people and ensure that they're not leered upon by dirty old men.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kezz on Oct 30, 2006 12:44:09 GMT
I'm shocked that even if it was in your strange mind kez, to want to watch 16 year olds having sex, that you would be daft enough to tell the world about it This is defo not something that i would be voting for you filthy git!! I wouldn't be any more shocked if in your next post you put 'If she's old enough to pull em up, she can pull em down' Thats probably your favorite saying on a Saturday night out ;D Oh Shim, anything for a stab at me ay? (Again I'm just joking).  OK, did we not get that one? The Just Joking post? Maybe It wasn't such a good Idea to Try to find Humour out of such a sensative subject.. Therefore I've deleted my comments so people don't take it to heart so much.. |
|
|
|
Post by Companero on Oct 30, 2006 12:55:46 GMT
Kezz - My comments were directed at the topic/guy that originated it, mate.
Why is it that when I was reading the initial posts in this thread, I thought of the following people:
Michael Jackson
Woody Allen
Gary Glitter
R Kelly
Cliff Richard?
...I don't know, neither.
|
|
|
|
Post by PatrickCoyle on Oct 30, 2006 13:07:47 GMT
I thought of Larry Clark.
This has been the most serious thread we've ever had, I reckon.
|
|
|
|
Post by large michael on Oct 30, 2006 13:15:00 GMT
i swear theres a movie plot developing here. Cliff?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Oct 30, 2006 13:16:40 GMT
Jonathan King? This seems to be turning into a little game now. Probably not wise.  |
|
|
|
Post by large michael on Oct 30, 2006 13:18:58 GMT
Kezz - My comments were directed at the topic/guy that originated it, mate. Why is it that when I was reading the initial posts in this thread, I thought of the following people: Michael Jackson Woody Allen Gary Glitter R Kelly Cliff Richard? ...I don't know, neither. Is it because they use seemingly reasonable arguments to justify the unjustifiable ? Because as men with power and trust they have systematically abused that power and trust? They dont like women they're own age? you decide.... |
|
